Should politically active churches lose nonprofit status?
Hat Tip: Baltimore Politics Examiner/Adam Meister
Separation of Church and State does not exist in Baltimore
By Adam Meister
Drive around Baltimore and you will notice that there are a lot of churches. Some are in large magnificent buildings while others are in run down storefronts or rowhouses. Most of them are tax exempt in one way or another. Many are considered 501(c)(3) organizations. 501(c)(3) organizations are not allowed to give political endorsements or aid to specific candidates. This law is ignored in Baltimore. Most of the so-called “serious candidates” for local office attend services every Sunday during campaign season. It is an unofficial rule of Baltimore campaigning to befriend as many local pastors (who usually live outside of Baltimore) as possible. They give you the support of their followers and you eventually reward them once you are in power.
I have no problem with churches collecting money to support prayer services and activities that pertain to goodwill, charity, and worship. I do have problems with churches that become huge tax exempt businesses that suck money away from parishioners. I have a problem with religion taking control of government and the elimination of the separation of church and state inside of Baltimore.
Do you find it troubling that supposedly neutral religious institutions yield so much power in a city so desperate for tax revenue?
Here are some interesting links about the power and powerful members of one particular church:
Three new members nominated to the Board by O’Malley
Faith-based Community in Baltimore wants a new role in real estate
